Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown Archetype | auzzie51 | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769925 |
| Azorius Omniscience | dazai | 9-1 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | -nausea- | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769865 |
| Jeskai Control | scipios | 8-1 | None |
| Jeskai Control | soulstrong | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769865 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | sanpop | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765784 |
| Esper Pixie | houseofmanamtg | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765757 |
| Esper Pixie | gyrabbit47 | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765778 |
| Esper Pixie | rnicof | 7-1 | None |
| Jeskai Control | spyromancer | 7-1 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Control , Azorius Flash , Azorius Omniscience , Azorius Tempo , Bant Beanstalk , Bant Omniscience , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Midrange
Meta Performance Analysis
Stock Up ranks #245 out of approximately 396 cards in raw efficiency (top 62%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 73.2%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Stock Up is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 15.60 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 75.9%. Stock Up has a win rate of 76.8%, making it 1.2% better than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Third Path Iconoclast | Creature — Human Monk | 36 | 83.6% | 19 |
| Slick Sequence | Instant | 26 | 78.4% | 15 |
| Dragonologist | Creature — Human Wizard | 5 | 78.1% | 3 |
| Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 69 | 77.7% | 34 |
| Dispelling Exhale | Instant | 58 | 77.6% | 27 |
| Enter the Enigma | Sorcery | 8 | 77.3% | 5 |
| Chandra, Spark Hunter | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 7 | 76.3% | 4 |
| Shiko, Paragon of the Way | Legendary Creature — Spirit Dragon | 63 | 75.9% | 26 |
| Bounce Off | Instant | 21 | 75.7% | 13 |
| Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 70 | 75.5% | 29 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Stock Up than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boltwave | Sorcery | 1 | 6 | 100.0% | 80.7% | +19.3% |
| Obliterating Bolt | Sorcery | 2 | 5 | 88.0% | 74.5% | +13.5% |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 17 | 88.0% | 77.0% | +11.0% |
| Zur, Eternal Schemer | Legendary Creature — Human Wizard | 3 | 5 | 85.0% | 74.7% | +10.3% |
| Analyze the Pollen | Sorcery | 1 | 6 | 85.0% | 75.5% | +9.5% |
| Leyline Binding | Enchantment | 6 | 5 | 85.0% | 76.2% | +8.8% |
| Up the Beanstalk | Enchantment | 2 | 6 | 85.0% | 76.4% | +8.6% |
| Overlord of the Hauntwoods | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 5 | 85.0% | 76.4% | +8.6% |
| Tear Asunder | Instant | 2 | 5 | 85.0% | 77.1% | +7.9% |
| Wrenn's Resolve | Sorcery | 2 | 15 | 85.0% | 77.5% | +7.5% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 409 | 25.7% | 57.4% |
| Azorius Control | 344 | 88.0% | 54.1% |
| Azorius Omniscience | 257 | 71.0% | 50.9% |
| Domain Zur Overlords | 185 | 14.0% | 45.8% |
| Izzet Spellslingers | 120 | 77.9% | 72.9% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.